Yesterday, several people in the Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) community voiced bewilderment after noticing a green candle appear on StakeBin, a website that allows users to follow the supply of LUNC.
Some people in the community were shocked to learn from the candle that the chain had approximately 200 million LUNC minted.
As someone who is also implementing a new validator I am affected by my own proposal, positive or negative effects
— Centurion (@0xCenturion) October 22, 2022
Validators don’t see the burn money, they need tx fees from taxable transactions to generate revenue. This is not an applicable argument
Binance/KuCoin have val’s
Read: New Code To Re-Open IBC On Terra Classic Is Ready, Famous Cosmos Developer Unveils
As a result, the Terra Rebels, a separate group of programmers who maintain the Terra Classic network, have had to specify that the newly created LUNC is the result of the community’s acceptance of proposal 5234. Notably, core developer Tobias Andersen AKA Zaradar published a passage from an essay written by fellow core developer Edward Kim in which he forewarned the community not to be taken aback when they saw a green candle on the chart.
— Tobias Andersen (@ZaradarBH) October 26, 2022
On October 17, the community approved Proposal 5234, which cut the on-chain burn fee from 1.2% to 0.2%. Additionally, it reserves 10% of the burn after each LUNC chain epoch (about seven days) for the community pool in order to support network development. This 10% needed from the overall burn is minted and delivered to the community pool, as Kim noted in the Medium blog post explaining his choice to support the proposal during the governance vote process.
The initial astonishment was increased by the fact that several community members were not aware that the proposal would collect seigniorage on all burns, not just the burn resulting from the on-chain fee. Although Kim’s article does a fantastic job of collecting this information, several community members don’t seem to agree that it is true. Some people, according to comments, think that the Binance burn and any other volunteer fires started by members of the community and supporters should be prohibited.
is that 200M #LUNC 10% of the bunt amount for the last 7 days? if yes, then you count #Binance burn, validators burns, and the person's own initiatives to burn.
— Muhammad Ibrahim 🌕 (@Muhamma44883621) October 26, 2022
all of the above burns are PRIVATE money and must not be counted in minting.
Read also: The New 0.2% Tax Burn Update Doubles Terra Classic On-Chain Volume
ReXx of the Terra Rebels, in particular, has already offered a straightforward solution to the issue, stating that the neighborhood can propose to take the difference out of the community pool and send it to the burn address.
Please do not be alarmed with the recent “mint” candle. https://t.co/hsWSFuv2oE
— reXx™ (@CosmoSreXx) October 26, 2022
It is important to remember that the community approved proposal 5234 in the hopes of gaining back lost on-chain volume and accelerating LUNC Burns. Sadly, It’s revealed that while on-chain volume has increased, the rate of burns from the on-chain fee has drastically decreased.
Olasunkanmi Abudu
Olasunkanmi Abudu is a Web3 content writer with over five years of experience covering blockchain, decentralized finance, and digital assets. He specializes in producing well-researched and accessible content that explains complex technologies and market trends to both general readers and industry professionals.






